Cameron diaz young nude watch online
This argument has no merit.
In this Tech Minute, here's how this change will impact your deliveries.
The case becomes relevant to Police Blotter because of evidence from Rutter's computers that was used as evidence by the prosecution.
Rutter moved to exclude any expert opinion testimony derived from the contents of the laptop on the ground prosecution's late disclosure of such testimony unfairly prejudiced his defense.
The trial court denied the motion to exclude the expert's testimony.
The appeals court upheld the conviction of photographer John Rutter.
Nothing in the record suggests the prosecution learned of its expert's opinion based on the laptop evidence prior to receiving his written report.
Rutter intended to counter this evidence with evidence someone other than he placed the allegedly forged document on those disks.
What happened, according to court documents:
Rutter maintained, however, none of this was relevant.
Thus the prosecution satisfied section